Verifying images, video and claims

Answer in [ANSWER LANGUAGE], even if the material below is in another language.

I have a claim I cannot verify yet. Do NOT tell me whether it is true, and do not estimate how likely it is. I need a plan for checking it.

Rules:
1. Give no verdict. Do not write "probably", "likely", "appears genuine" or any other judgement of the claim.
2. Do not perform the checks. Do not search. Write the plan only.
3. Name people by type of person or institution, never by name.
4. If a check needs something I did not give you, say what it is instead of assuming it.

The claim: [WRITE THE CLAIM IN ONE SENTENCE]
What I have: [DESCRIBE WHAT YOU HAVE: a photo, a video, a document, a forwarded message, a screenshot]
What I already know: [DATE, PLACE, WHO IS SAYING IT, WHERE IT CAME FROM]

Give me, in this order:
A. What would have to be true for this claim to hold, as separate testable statements.
B. The checks, ordered from cheapest to most expensive, and for each one the result that would support the claim and the result that would refute it.
C. What evidence would disprove the claim, and who could confirm or refute it locally, by type of person or institution and never by name.
D. What cannot be checked from the material I have, including what you, as a language model, cannot check at all.

Answer in [ANSWER LANGUAGE], even if the material below is in another language.

I have a forwarded message and two minutes. I am standing up, on a phone. Do NOT tell me whether the message is true or false, and do not say how likely either is.

Rules:
1. Every check in section A must be doable in two minutes on a phone, with no computer, no account and no paid tool.
2. Public sources only. Do not send me to a login or to a payment.
3. Do not judge the message. Do not add facts of your own about the event it describes.
4. Keep each check to one line. Order them by what rules the message out fastest.

Give me, in this order:
A. The five checks, numbered, in order, each on one line, each ending with what a yes would mean and what a no would mean.
B. What would settle it: the one piece of evidence that would end the question, and the type of person or office that holds it. No names.
C. One sentence to send back to whoever forwarded it, if the checks do not settle it. It must ask where the message came from, and must not call it false.
D. What you cannot check here at all.

The message:
[PASTE THE FORWARDED MESSAGE]

Answer in [ANSWER LANGUAGE], even if the material below is in another language.

Below are photograph captions written by different people. Every caption is numbered. I need to know which ones make a claim we cannot support yet.

Rules:
1. A caption that describes what is visible is a description. A caption that names a place, a date, a cause, a number or a person is making a claim. Treat the two differently.
2. Do not decide whether a claim is true. Decide what evidence would be needed.
3. Never invent a detail, a place or a date. Never add a caption I did not paste.
4. Keep the wording of every caption exactly as written, including mixed digits: ١٢٣ alongside 123, and including spelling mistakes.
5. Every caption gets exactly one decision: publish, hold, or rewrite.
6. You cannot see the photographs. Where a decision depends on what the image actually shows, say so in the evidence column.

Give me, in this order:
A. A table, one row per caption: number, the caption as written, what it claims as fact, what evidence that claim would need, and the decision.
B. The rewrites, one for each caption marked rewrite, keeping only what a photograph can show and dropping the rest.
C. Every caption marked hold, with the one thing that would move it to publish.
D. Captions where you could not tell what was being claimed, and the question to put to the person who wrote it.

If you are reading on a phone, replace the table with one block per row: a heading line, then one short labelled line per column.

The captions:
[PASTE THE CAPTIONS, NUMBERED]