Monitoring news and social media at scale

Answer in [ANSWER LANGUAGE], even if the material below is in another language.

Below is a list of published items from this week: headline, outlet, date, and a link or a short extract for each.

Rules:
1. Use only the items below. Add no background from your own knowledge.
2. Group them into themes. Name each theme in plain words.
3. Merge items that report the same event into one line, and list every outlet that reported it. If two outlets contradict each other, keep both versions in that line and write CONTRADICTION.
4. Mark SINGLE SOURCE where only one outlet reports something.
5. Dates may arrive in mixed digits: ١٢٣ alongside 123. Copy each date as it appears in the item.
6. Do not judge whether a claim is true. If an item does not say who or when, write "the item does not say".

Give me, in this order:
A. The themes, most reported first. Under each theme, one line per item: what is claimed, which outlet, what date.
B. Everything marked SINGLE SOURCE or CONTRADICTION, as one list.
C. What is missing: which of these stories has no follow-up, and which claims nobody has answered.
D. Five lines a colleague could read aloud in a meeting.

Items:
[PASTE THE ITEMS]

Answer in [ANSWER LANGUAGE], even if the material below is in another language.

Build me a weekly routine for watching one topic. I have no paid tool and no budget. I will run every search by hand on a phone.

The topic: [WRITE THE TOPIC IN A FEW WORDS, AND THE PLACE NAME IF IT HAS ONE]

Rules:
1. You cannot search. Say so in one line at the top, and never report what anyone is saying about this topic now.
2. Search phrases only. No claim, no finding, no figure, and no name of an organisation you are not certain of.
3. Public sources only. Nothing that needs a login, a payment or a private group.
4. Do not ask me about my organisation, my colleagues or our funding. If a fact like that would change your answer, write it as a question for me to answer away from the tool.
5. Everything must fit inside thirty minutes a week.

Give me, in this order:
A. Eight to twelve search phrases. One per line, in this form: the phrase, then its language (Arabic, Kurdish or English), then the one public place to run it (a general search engine, a news search, the public search inside a platform I already use, or the website of the body that publishes on this topic). Cover all three languages, and write the Arabic and Kurdish phrases in their own script, not transliterated.
B. What to record for every hit, as four labelled lines and no more: date published, who published it, the one sentence that matters quoted exactly, and the link. Copy dates exactly as written, including mixed digits: ١٢٣ alongside 123.
C. The half hour, split into named steps with the minutes against each, ending with one step where I write three lines for a colleague.
D. What this routine will miss, and the two phrases most likely to return noise instead of hits.

Do not run the searches. Write the routine.

Answer in [ANSWER LANGUAGE], even if the material below is in another language.

Below are public posts that look coordinated to me. Do NOT tell me whether they are coordinated, and do not estimate how likely it is. I need to know what to check.

Rules:
1. Never conclude that coordination happened. That conclusion is mine to reach or to drop.
2. Replace every account with Account 1, Account 2 and so on. Never repeat a handle, a display name or a description of a profile picture, and never say anything about the person behind an account.
3. Report only what is in the posts below. Do not add background from your own knowledge.
4. For every pattern, give the innocent explanation as well. Two accounts posting the same sentence may have copied the same public statement.

Give me, in this order:
A. The patterns to check, one block each, starting with timing, identical phrasing, account age and shared links. For each one: what to look at, the observation that would strengthen the reading, the observation that would weaken it, and the innocent explanation.
B. What the posts below already show, as observations only: repeated wording quoted exactly, times as they appear, links that appear more than once. No conclusion.
C. What cannot be decided from public posts at all, and what a person would have to obtain to decide it.
D. One sentence I can put in a note instead of the word "coordinated", describing only what was observed.

The posts:
[PASTE THE POSTS, WITH THE TIME AND THE DATE ON EACH]