Prompts
Draft a comment on a published draft law
Gives you a submission that names the article, proposes the exact replacement wording, ties the reason to evidence you supplied, and marks every place where your evidence is missing.
What may go into it: Public or invented material only
The prompt
Answer in [ANSWER LANGUAGE], even if the material below is in another language. Below is a published draft law, and a list of the articles I want to comment on with my own published evidence for each. Write the comment I will submit. Rules: 1. Comment only on the articles I list. Add no other article, however weak it looks. 2. Use only the evidence I give you. Never invent a case, a figure, a date or a source, and never add an example of your own. 3. Where my evidence does not carry the point, write "Evidence missing" and the one line I would have to supply. 4. Quote the article's current wording exactly, then give the proposed wording in full, so the two can be read side by side. 5. Plain and formal. Propose wording. Do not argue about motive and do not accuse. Give me, for each article I list, in this order: A. The article number, its current wording quoted, and the exact wording proposed instead. B. The reason, in one sentence, naming which of my evidence lines it rests on. C. The effect on the people this article reaches, using only what my evidence says. Where my evidence does not say, write it as a question for me to answer before I submit. Then once at the end: D. Every "Evidence missing" line, gathered in one list. Keep the whole comment under one page. Draft law: [PASTE THE ARTICLES OF THE DRAFT LAW] Articles I am commenting on, and my evidence for each: [LIST EACH ARTICLE NUMBER AND ONE LINE OF YOUR OWN PUBLISHED EVIDENCE]
Opens a new chat in that tool with this prompt already typed in. Fill in every box first, and read the line at the top about what may go into it.
25 minutes · Gives you short sections · Works on a phone · How much to paste at once: Paste at most five articles with their definitions at a time. If the answer skips an article you listed, or stops mid sentence, ask again with fewer articles.
Read the answer against the checks below before you use it in anything that leaves your organisation.
What to fill in
- [ANSWER LANGUAGE]. Name the language the submission must be in, which is usually the language of the draft.
- [PASTE THE ARTICLES OF THE DRAFT LAW]. Paste only the articles you are commenting on, plus any definitions they refer to. Published drafts only.
- [LIST EACH ARTICLE NUMBER AND ONE LINE OF YOUR OWN PUBLISHED EVIDENCE]. One line per article, from something you have already published. If you have no evidence for an article, leave that article out rather than filling the line.
Before you trust the answer
- Read section D first. An article whose evidence is missing is not ready to submit.
- Check every quoted article and article number against the published draft. A comment on the wrong number is set aside unread.
- Read the proposed wording against the sentence around it in the draft. If it does not fit, rewrite it yourself.
When it goes wrong
It will supply a plausible case or figure you never gave it, presented as your own evidence in a document that goes out under your name.
Tools this is written for
Written 2026-09-01Nobody has run this prompt in this language yet, so read the answer twice.
- Never for sensitive materialHas a free versionWorks in Iraq
- Never for sensitive materialHas a free versionWorks in Iraq
- Never for sensitive materialHas a free versionWorks in Iraq
Where to go next
- The task this belongs toFollowing legislation, courts and gazettes
- Staying safeClassify the material first
Written forLegal work and accountabilityDirector or leadership